Side by sideSuburb comparison

Melonba vs Shanes Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Melonba edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Melonba (982) sits above Shanes Park (944). Melonba skews owner-occupied (90%), Shanes Park runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Melonba edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 944). Melonba also has a higher family-household share (95% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMelonba vs Shanes Park

Common questions

Does Melonba or Shanes Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Melonba scores 982 vs 944 in Shanes Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Melonba
Metric
Shanes Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$540/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$600/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$440/wk
90.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
25
Bike score
100
1,439
Population
384
31
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
982
Avg ICSEA
944

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).