Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mickett Creek vs Holmes.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Holmes scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mickett Creek (933) sits above Holmes (932).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mickett Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (933 vs 932).

Common questionsMickett Creek vs Holmes

Common questions

Does Mickett Creek or Holmes have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mickett Creek scores 933 vs 932 in Holmes. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Mickett Creek or Holmes?

Holmes scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mickett Creek
Metric
Holmes

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$80/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$68/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$306/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
14
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
25,304
Population
18,634
30
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
933
Avg ICSEA
932

Climate

1705 mm
Annual rainfall
1705 mm
31.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).