Side by sideSuburb comparison

Middlesex vs Manjimup.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Manjimup edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Manjimup scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 94/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Middlesex skews owner-occupied (75%), Manjimup runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsMiddlesex vs Manjimup

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Middlesex or Manjimup?

Manjimup scores 94/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Middlesex
Metric
Manjimup

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$235/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$235/wk
$178/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
63.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
34.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
94
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
80
232
Population
4,279
55
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
5
980
Avg ICSEA
980

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).