Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mingoola vs Bonshaw.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mingoola edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mingoola (905) sits above Bonshaw (882). Bonshaw skews owner-occupied (89%), Mingoola runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mingoola edges out on average school ICSEA (905 vs 882). Bonshaw also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 38%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMingoola vs Bonshaw

Common questions

Does Mingoola or Bonshaw have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mingoola scores 905 vs 882 in Bonshaw. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mingoola
Metric
Bonshaw

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$185/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
89.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
7
Population
133
59
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
3
905
Avg ICSEA
882

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).