Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mondrook vs The Bight.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Mondrook skews owner-occupied (82%), The Bight runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

The numbers behind the take

Mondrook
Metric
The Bight

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$305/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$258/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
167
Population
60
52
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
15
905
Avg ICSEA
905

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).