Side by sideSuburb comparison

Moonambel vs Percydale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Moonambel edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Moonambel scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Percydale skews owner-occupied (110%), Moonambel runs more rental-dense (87% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Percydale has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 69%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsMoonambel vs Percydale

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Moonambel or Percydale?

Moonambel scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Moonambel
Metric
Percydale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$185/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$185/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$346/wk
87.0%
Owner occupied
110.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
15
Bike score
0
185
Population
22
61
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
14
947
Avg ICSEA
947

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
23.2°C
Mean max (Jan)
23.2°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).