Side by sideSuburb comparison

Moonbi vs Kootingal.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Kootingal scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 16/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Moonbi (961) sits above Kootingal (940).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Moonbi edges out on average school ICSEA (961 vs 940).

Common questionsMoonbi vs Kootingal

Common questions

Does Moonbi or Kootingal have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Moonbi scores 961 vs 940 in Kootingal. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Moonbi or Kootingal?

Kootingal scores 16/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Moonbi
Metric
Kootingal

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$220/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
72.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied
26.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
16
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,201
Population
2,313
50
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
20
961
Avg ICSEA
940

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).