Side by sideSuburb comparison

Moorbel vs Canowindra.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Moorbel skews owner-occupied (91%), Canowindra runs more rental-dense (72% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Moorbel has a heavier family-household mix (78% vs 66%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Moorbel
Metric
Canowindra

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$210/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
72.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
251
Population
2,437
46
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
973
Avg ICSEA
973

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).