Side by sideSuburb comparison

Morgantown vs Carnarvon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Carnarvon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Carnarvon scores higher on walkability (30/100 vs 38/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Carnarvon skews owner-occupied (55%), Morgantown runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsMorgantown vs Carnarvon

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Morgantown or Carnarvon?

Carnarvon scores 38/100 on walkability vs 30/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Morgantown
Metric
Carnarvon

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$209/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$209/wk
$205/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$210/wk
44.0%
Owner occupied
55.0%
51.0%
Renter occupied
43.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

30
Walk score
38
0
Transit score
0
5
Bike score
5
774
Population
281
38
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
934
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).