Side by sideSuburb comparison

Morton Vale vs Lockyer Waters.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Morton Vale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Morton Vale (965) sits above Lockyer Waters (930). Lockyer Waters skews owner-occupied (88%), Morton Vale runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Morton Vale edges out on average school ICSEA (965 vs 930). Lockyer Waters also has a higher family-household share (76% vs 63%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMorton Vale vs Lockyer Waters

Common questions

Does Morton Vale or Lockyer Waters have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Morton Vale scores 965 vs 930 in Lockyer Waters. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Morton Vale
Metric
Lockyer Waters

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$310/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
114
Population
538
53
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
5
965
Avg ICSEA
930

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).