Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Alford vs Coochin.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Alford edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Mount Alford scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsMount Alford vs Coochin

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Mount Alford or Coochin?

Mount Alford scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Alford
Metric
Coochin

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$291/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$291/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
81.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
294
Population
115
54
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
8
984
Avg ICSEA
984

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).