Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Austin vs Bourkelands.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $475,500 and $735,000.

Mount Austin (median $475,500) is roughly 35% cheaper to buy into than Bourkelands ($735,000). Over the past year, Bourkelands (+5.2%) ran 1.8 percentage points ahead of Mount Austin (+3.4%) on house-price growth.

Mount Austin scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bourkelands (961) sits above Mount Austin (947). Bourkelands skews owner-occupied (73%), Mount Austin runs more rental-dense (51% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Mount Austin is the lower entry point at $475,500 median, 35% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Mount Austin delivers the better gross yield (6.01% vs 3.89%), but Bourkelands has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Bourkelands edges out on average school ICSEA (961 vs 947). Bourkelands also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 59%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Austin vs Bourkelands

Common questions

Is Mount Austin or Bourkelands cheaper to buy in?

Mount Austin has the lower median house price at $475,500, roughly 35% below Bourkelands ($735,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Mount Austin or Bourkelands?

Over the past 12 months, Bourkelands grew +5.2% vs +3.4% in Mount Austin, a gap of 1.8 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Mount Austin or Bourkelands have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bourkelands scores 961 vs 947 in Mount Austin. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Mount Austin or Bourkelands?

Mount Austin scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Mount Austin or Bourkelands?

Gross rental yield on houses is 6.01% in Mount Austin vs 3.89% in Bourkelands. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Austin
Metric
Bourkelands

Price & Market

$475,500
Median house
$735,000
$240,480
Median unit
$240,480
+3.4%
Annual growth (house)
+5.2%
Days on market

Rental

$550/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$420/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$420/wk
51.0%
Owner occupied
73.0%
45.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
4,035
Population
3,113
37
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
947
Avg ICSEA
961

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).