Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Buller vs Wabonga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Mount Buller scores higher on walkability (30/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wabonga (1011) sits above Mount Buller (1004).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wabonga edges out on average school ICSEA (1011 vs 1004).

Common questionsMount Buller vs Wabonga

Common questions

Does Mount Buller or Wabonga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wabonga scores 1011 vs 1004 in Mount Buller. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Mount Buller or Wabonga?

Mount Buller scores 30/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Buller
Metric
Wabonga

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$273/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$241/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
56.0%
Owner occupied
51.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

30
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
60
Bike score
0
333
Population
6,568
27
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
3
1004
Avg ICSEA
1011

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).