Mount Burnett vs Pakenham Upper

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Burnett (1021) sits above Pakenham Upper (1013).

Buying in Mount Burnett or Pakenham Upper?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Burnett? The free selling guide

Mount Burnett and Pakenham Upper side by side

MeasureMount BurnettPakenham Upper
Renting
Owner occupied98.0%94.0%
Renter occupied6.0%3.0%
Schools
Schools nearby820
Average ICSEA10211013
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population1801,196
Median age4244
Climate
Annual rainfall1007 mm1007 mm
Mean max, January25.6°C25.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mount Burnett edges out on average school ICSEA (1021 vs 1013). Mount Burnett also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 84%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Mount Burnett vs Pakenham Upper: common questions

Does Mount Burnett or Pakenham Upper have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Burnett scores 1021 vs 1013 in Pakenham Upper. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.