Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Cooke vs Flint.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Flint edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Flint (1009) sits above Mount Cooke (991).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Flint edges out on average school ICSEA (1009 vs 991).

Common questionsMount Cooke vs Flint

Common questions

Does Mount Cooke or Flint have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Flint scores 1009 vs 991 in Mount Cooke. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Cooke
Metric
Flint

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$238/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$221/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,673
Population
3,485
42
Median age
24

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
5
991
Avg ICSEA
1009

Climate

724 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).