Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Frome vs Mullamuddy.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Frome edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Frome (957) sits above Mullamuddy (942). Mount Frome skews owner-occupied (83%), Mullamuddy runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Frome edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 942).

Common questionsMount Frome vs Mullamuddy

Common questions

Does Mount Frome or Mullamuddy have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Frome scores 957 vs 942 in Mullamuddy. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Frome
Metric
Mullamuddy

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$360/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
120
Population
95
39
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
5
957
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).