Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Hunter vs Orangeville.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $983,000 and $2,200,000.

Mount Hunter (median $983,000) is roughly 55% cheaper to buy into than Orangeville ($2,200,000). Over the past year, Orangeville (+16.4%) ran 16.4 percentage points ahead of Mount Hunter (0%) on house-price growth.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Mount Hunter is the lower entry point at $983,000 median, 55% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Mount Hunter delivers the better gross yield (4.07% vs 1.82%), but Orangeville has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsMount Hunter vs Orangeville

Common questions

Is Mount Hunter or Orangeville cheaper to buy in?

Mount Hunter has the lower median house price at $983,000, roughly 55% below Orangeville ($2,200,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Mount Hunter or Orangeville?

Over the past 12 months, Orangeville grew +16.4% vs 0% in Mount Hunter, a gap of 16.4 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Mount Hunter or Orangeville?

Gross rental yield on houses is 4.07% in Mount Hunter vs 1.82% in Orangeville. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Hunter
Metric
Orangeville

Price & Market

$983,000
Median house
$2,200,000
$398,160
Median unit
$398,160
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+16.4%
Days on market

Rental

$770/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$770/wk
$520/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$520/wk
87.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
749
Population
1,354
39
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
9
1010
Avg ICSEA
1010

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).