Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Lindesay vs Running Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Running Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Running Creek (982) sits above Mount Lindesay (924).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Running Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 924).

Common questionsMount Lindesay vs Running Creek

Common questions

Does Mount Lindesay or Running Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Running Creek scores 982 vs 924 in Mount Lindesay. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Lindesay
Metric
Running Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$196/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$196/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
938
Population
938
47
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
20
924
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).