Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Macedon vs Cherokee.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Macedon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Macedon (1097) sits above Cherokee (1088). Cherokee skews owner-occupied (106%), Mount Macedon runs more rental-dense (89% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Macedon edges out on average school ICSEA (1097 vs 1088). Cherokee also has a higher family-household share (94% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Macedon vs Cherokee

Common questions

Does Mount Macedon or Cherokee have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Macedon scores 1097 vs 1088 in Cherokee. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Macedon
Metric
Cherokee

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$371/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
106.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,450
Population
68
48
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
11
1097
Avg ICSEA
1088

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).