Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Mcintyre vs Mount Burr.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Burr edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Burr (951) sits above Mount Mcintyre (948). Mount Burr skews owner-occupied (86%), Mount Mcintyre runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Burr edges out on average school ICSEA (951 vs 948).

Common questionsMount Mcintyre vs Mount Burr

Common questions

Does Mount Mcintyre or Mount Burr have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Burr scores 951 vs 948 in Mount Mcintyre. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Mcintyre
Metric
Mount Burr

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$155/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$145/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
70
Population
367
50
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
5
948
Avg ICSEA
951

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).