Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Roland vs Promised Land.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Promised Land scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Roland (933) sits above Promised Land (921).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Roland edges out on average school ICSEA (933 vs 921).

Common questionsMount Roland vs Promised Land

Common questions

Does Mount Roland or Promised Land have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Roland scores 933 vs 921 in Promised Land. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Mount Roland or Promised Land?

Promised Land scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Roland
Metric
Promised Land

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$208/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$208/wk
$177/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$177/wk
Owner occupied
86.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
4,276
Population
32
50
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
933
Avg ICSEA
921

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).