Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Stirling vs Cubbine.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cubbine edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cubbine (939) sits above Mount Stirling (934).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cubbine edges out on average school ICSEA (939 vs 934). Mount Stirling also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Stirling vs Cubbine

Common questions

Does Mount Stirling or Cubbine have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cubbine scores 939 vs 934 in Mount Stirling. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Stirling
Metric
Cubbine

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$130/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$130/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$111/wk
Owner occupied
38.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
16
Population
27
30
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
934
Avg ICSEA
939

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).