Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Tarampa vs Clarendon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Tarampa edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Tarampa (942) sits above Clarendon (917).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Tarampa edges out on average school ICSEA (942 vs 917).

Common questionsMount Tarampa vs Clarendon

Common questions

Does Mount Tarampa or Clarendon have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Tarampa scores 942 vs 917 in Clarendon. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Tarampa
Metric
Clarendon

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$340/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
15.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
501
Population
10,412
42
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
9
942
Avg ICSEA
917

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).