Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mountain Lagoon vs Upper Colo.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mountain Lagoon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mountain Lagoon (1003) sits above Upper Colo (992). Mountain Lagoon skews owner-occupied (90%), Upper Colo runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mountain Lagoon edges out on average school ICSEA (1003 vs 992). Mountain Lagoon also has a higher family-household share (90% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMountain Lagoon vs Upper Colo

Common questions

Does Mountain Lagoon or Upper Colo have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mountain Lagoon scores 1003 vs 992 in Upper Colo. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mountain Lagoon
Metric
Upper Colo

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$440/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$360/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
90.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
10.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
78
Population
48
55
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
16
1003
Avg ICSEA
992

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).