Mudjimba vs Marcoola

Mudjimba scores higher on walkability (24/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mudjimba skews owner-occupied (69%), Marcoola runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

Buying in Mudjimba or Marcoola?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mudjimba? The free selling guide

Mudjimba and Marcoola side by side

MeasureMudjimbaMarcoola
Renting
House rent–$433/wk
Unit rent–$750/wk
Owner occupied69.0%58.0%
Renter occupied29.0%40.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1514
Average ICSEA10521052
Lifestyle and people
Walk score240
Transit score00
Bike score10030
Population2,6643,355
Median age4445
Climate
Annual rainfall1486 mm1543 mm
Mean max, January29.1°C29.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mudjimba has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Mudjimba vs Marcoola: common questions

Which is more walkable, Mudjimba or Marcoola?

Mudjimba scores 24/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.