Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mullaquana vs Whyalla Norrie.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mullaquana edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Mullaquana scores higher on walkability (44/100 vs 26/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mullaquana skews owner-occupied (76%), Whyalla Norrie runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mullaquana has a heavier family-household mix (71% vs 59%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsMullaquana vs Whyalla Norrie

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Mullaquana or Whyalla Norrie?

Mullaquana scores 44/100 on walkability vs 26/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mullaquana
Metric
Whyalla Norrie

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$170/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$307/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$275/wk
76.0%
Owner occupied
54.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
44.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

44
Walk score
26
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
272
Population
6,288
52
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
11
901
Avg ICSEA
901

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).