Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mulyandry vs Bandon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Bandon scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 74/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mulyandry (935) sits above Bandon (917).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mulyandry edges out on average school ICSEA (935 vs 917).

Common questionsMulyandry vs Bandon

Common questions

Does Mulyandry or Bandon have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mulyandry scores 935 vs 917 in Bandon. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Mulyandry or Bandon?

Bandon scores 74/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mulyandry
Metric
Bandon

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$196/wk
41.0%
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
74
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
65
38
Population
8,965
61
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
5
935
Avg ICSEA
917

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).