Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mumberkine vs Rossmore.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Rossmore edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rossmore (926) sits above Mumberkine (917). Mumberkine skews owner-occupied (78%), Rossmore runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Rossmore edges out on average school ICSEA (926 vs 917). Rossmore also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMumberkine vs Rossmore

Common questions

Does Mumberkine or Rossmore have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rossmore scores 926 vs 917 in Mumberkine. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mumberkine
Metric
Rossmore

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$220/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
44.0%
30.0%
Renter occupied
44.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
57
Population
23
43
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
12
917
Avg ICSEA
926

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).