Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mummel vs Woodhouselee.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mummel edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mummel (973) sits above Woodhouselee (970). Mummel skews owner-occupied (91%), Woodhouselee runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mummel edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 970). Woodhouselee also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 84%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMummel vs Woodhouselee

Common questions

Does Mummel or Woodhouselee have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mummel scores 973 vs 970 in Woodhouselee. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mummel
Metric
Woodhouselee

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
43.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
129
Population
23
46
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
15
973
Avg ICSEA
970

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).