Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mummulgum vs Simpkins Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mummulgum edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mummulgum (893) sits above Simpkins Creek (868). Mummulgum skews owner-occupied (97%), Simpkins Creek runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mummulgum edges out on average school ICSEA (893 vs 868). Simpkins Creek also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMummulgum vs Simpkins Creek

Common questions

Does Mummulgum or Simpkins Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mummulgum scores 893 vs 868 in Simpkins Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mummulgum
Metric
Simpkins Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$225/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
97.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
10.0%
Renter occupied
42.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
105
Population
28
45
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
3
893
Avg ICSEA
868

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).