Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mungallala South vs Tyrconnel.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mungallala South edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Mungallala South scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Tyrconnel skews owner-occupied (183%), Mungallala South runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mungallala South has a heavier family-household mix (110% vs 50%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsMungallala South vs Tyrconnel

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Mungallala South or Tyrconnel?

Mungallala South scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mungallala South
Metric
Tyrconnel

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$110/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$110/wk
$94/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$94/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
183.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
38
Population
17
37
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
Avg ICSEA

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).