Side by sideSuburb comparison

Munna Point vs Little Cove.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Little Cove scores higher on walkability (28/100 vs 66/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Munna Point (1057) sits above Little Cove (1056).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Munna Point edges out on average school ICSEA (1057 vs 1056).

Common questionsMunna Point vs Little Cove

Common questions

Does Munna Point or Little Cove have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Munna Point scores 1057 vs 1056 in Little Cove. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Munna Point or Little Cove?

Little Cove scores 66/100 on walkability vs 28/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Munna Point
Metric
Little Cove

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$490/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$515/wk
$417/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$438/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

28
Walk score
66
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
8,716
Population
11,979
56
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
10
1057
Avg ICSEA
1056

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).