Side by sideSuburb comparison

Murrawombie vs Mount Foster.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Murrawombie edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Murrawombie (945) sits above Mount Foster (900).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Murrawombie edges out on average school ICSEA (945 vs 900).

Common questionsMurrawombie vs Mount Foster

Common questions

Does Murrawombie or Mount Foster have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Murrawombie scores 945 vs 900 in Mount Foster. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Murrawombie
Metric
Mount Foster

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$10/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
29
Population
18
30
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
945
Avg ICSEA
900

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).