Side by sideSuburb comparison

Myrtleville vs Stonequarry.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Myrtleville edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Myrtleville (971) sits above Stonequarry (949). Stonequarry skews owner-occupied (108%), Myrtleville runs more rental-dense (82% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Myrtleville edges out on average school ICSEA (971 vs 949). Myrtleville also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 69%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMyrtleville vs Stonequarry

Common questions

Does Myrtleville or Stonequarry have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Myrtleville scores 971 vs 949 in Stonequarry. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Myrtleville
Metric
Stonequarry

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$272/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
108.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
100
Population
34
37
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
9
971
Avg ICSEA
949

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).