Narembeen vs Cramphorne.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Narembeen edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Narembeen scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Narembeen (997) sits above Cramphorne (968). Cramphorne skews owner-occupied (87%), Narembeen runs more rental-dense (69% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Narembeen edges out on average school ICSEA (997 vs 968).
Common questions
Does Narembeen or Cramphorne have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Narembeen scores 997 vs 968 in Cramphorne. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Narembeen or Cramphorne?
Narembeen scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Narembeen against another suburb