Neereman vs Baringhup

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Baringhup (1012) sits above Neereman (1007). Baringhup skews owner-occupied (91%), Neereman runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

Buying in Neereman or Baringhup?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Neereman? The free selling guide

Neereman and Baringhup side by side

MeasureNeeremanBaringhup
Renting
Owner occupied73.0%91.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10071012
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population23185
Median age5356
Climate
Annual rainfall452 mm487 mm
Mean max, January29.9°C29.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Baringhup edges out on average school ICSEA (1012 vs 1007). Neereman also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Neereman vs Baringhup: common questions

Does Neereman or Baringhup have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Baringhup scores 1012 vs 1007 in Neereman. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.