Side by sideSuburb comparison

New Buildings vs Wyndham.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. New Buildings edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving New Buildings (966) sits above Wyndham (964). Wyndham skews owner-occupied (90%), New Buildings runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

New Buildings edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 964). Wyndham also has a higher family-household share (70% vs 53%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsNew Buildings vs Wyndham

Common questions

Does New Buildings or Wyndham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), New Buildings scores 966 vs 964 in Wyndham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

New Buildings
Metric
Wyndham

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$225/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
90.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
31
Population
418
65
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
20
966
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).