Side by sideSuburb comparison

Newton Boyd vs Kingsgate.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kingsgate edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kingsgate (925) sits above Newton Boyd (891). Kingsgate skews owner-occupied (100%), Newton Boyd runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kingsgate edges out on average school ICSEA (925 vs 891).

Common questionsNewton Boyd vs Kingsgate

Common questions

Does Newton Boyd or Kingsgate have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kingsgate scores 925 vs 891 in Newton Boyd. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Newton Boyd
Metric
Kingsgate

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$191/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$191/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
21
Population
5
47
Median age
23

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
6
891
Avg ICSEA
925

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).