Side by sideSuburb comparison

Noosa Heads vs Munna Point.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Noosa Heads edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Noosa Heads scores higher on walkability (90/100 vs 28/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsNoosa Heads vs Munna Point

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Noosa Heads or Munna Point?

Noosa Heads scores 90/100 on walkability vs 28/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Noosa Heads
Metric
Munna Point

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$990/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$490/wk
$850/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$417/wk
73.0%
Owner occupied
24.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

90
Walk score
28
20
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
5,120
Population
8,716
54
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
11
1057
Avg ICSEA
1057

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).