Side by sideSuburb comparison

North Bungunya vs Kioma.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kioma edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kioma (919) sits above North Bungunya (906). North Bungunya skews owner-occupied (100%), Kioma runs more rental-dense (23% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kioma edges out on average school ICSEA (919 vs 906).

Common questionsNorth Bungunya vs Kioma

Common questions

Does North Bungunya or Kioma have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kioma scores 919 vs 906 in North Bungunya. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

North Bungunya
Metric
Kioma

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$75/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$110/wk
$64/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$44/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
23.0%
Renter occupied
54.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
35
Population
32
35
Median age
25

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
906
Avg ICSEA
919

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).