Side by sideSuburb comparison

North Ryde vs Macquarie Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Macquarie Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Macquarie Park (1118) sits above North Ryde (1098). North Ryde skews owner-occupied (61%), Macquarie Park runs more rental-dense (31% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Macquarie Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1118 vs 1098). North Ryde also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 57%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsNorth Ryde vs Macquarie Park

Common questions

Does North Ryde or Macquarie Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Macquarie Park scores 1118 vs 1098 in North Ryde. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

North Ryde
Metric
Macquarie Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$480/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$480/wk
$520/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$460/wk
61.0%
Owner occupied
31.0%
37.0%
Renter occupied
66.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

40
Walk score
0
Transit score
100
Bike score
14,043
Population
11,071
37
Median age
31

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1098
Avg ICSEA
1118

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).