Side by sideSuburb comparison

Novar Gardens vs Camden Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,505,000 and $1,225,000. Camden Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Camden Park (median $1,225,000) is roughly 23% cheaper to buy into than Novar Gardens ($1,505,000). Over the past year, Camden Park (+47.6%) ran 25.2 percentage points ahead of Novar Gardens (+22.4%) on house-price growth.

Camden Park scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 16/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Camden Park (1078) sits above Novar Gardens (1077). Novar Gardens skews owner-occupied (72%), Camden Park runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Camden Park is the lower entry point at $1,225,000 median, 23% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Camden Park carries both higher gross yield (2.89% vs 2.40%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Camden Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1078 vs 1077). Novar Gardens also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsNovar Gardens vs Camden Park

Common questions

Is Novar Gardens or Camden Park cheaper to buy in?

Camden Park has the lower median house price at $1,225,000, roughly 23% below Novar Gardens ($1,505,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Novar Gardens or Camden Park?

Over the past 12 months, Camden Park grew +47.6% vs +22.4% in Novar Gardens, a gap of 25.2 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Novar Gardens or Camden Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Camden Park scores 1078 vs 1077 in Novar Gardens. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Novar Gardens or Camden Park?

Camden Park scores 16/100 on walkability vs 12/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Novar Gardens or Camden Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.89% in Camden Park vs 2.40% in Novar Gardens. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Novar Gardens
Metric
Camden Park

Price & Market

$1,505,000
Median house
$1,225,000
$326,160
Median unit
$274,320
+22.4%
Annual growth (house)
+47.6%
Days on market

Rental

$695/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$680/wk
$360/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$455/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied
39.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

12
Walk score
16
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
2,508
Population
3,338
45
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1077
Avg ICSEA
1078

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).