Side by sideSuburb comparison

Nullawarre North vs Mepunga East.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mepunga East edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mepunga East (1009) sits above Nullawarre North (1005). Mepunga East skews owner-occupied (87%), Nullawarre North runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mepunga East edges out on average school ICSEA (1009 vs 1005). Nullawarre North also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 43%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsNullawarre North vs Mepunga East

Common questions

Does Nullawarre North or Mepunga East have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mepunga East scores 1009 vs 1005 in Nullawarre North. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Nullawarre North
Metric
Mepunga East

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$239/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$180/wk
53.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
46
Population
73
34
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
20
1005
Avg ICSEA
1009

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).