Side by sideSuburb comparison

Oaklands vs Coonong.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Coonong scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 22/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Oaklands (950) sits above Coonong (902).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Oaklands edges out on average school ICSEA (950 vs 902).

Common questionsOaklands vs Coonong

Common questions

Does Oaklands or Coonong have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Oaklands scores 950 vs 902 in Coonong. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Oaklands or Coonong?

Coonong scores 22/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Oaklands
Metric
Coonong

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$110/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$94/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
14.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
22
0
Transit score
0
5
Bike score
45
304
Population
339
50
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
3
950
Avg ICSEA
902

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).