Oaks vs Bishopsbourne

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Oaks (965) sits above Bishopsbourne (943). Oaks skews owner-occupied (113%), Bishopsbourne runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

Buying in Oaks or Bishopsbourne?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Oaks? The free selling guide

Oaks and Bishopsbourne side by side

MeasureOaksBishopsbourne
Renting
House rent$250/wk$260/wk
Unit rent$300/wk$195/wk
Owner occupied113.0%74.0%
Renter occupied38.0%8.0%
Schools
Schools nearby82
Average ICSEA965943
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population24137
Median age5847
Climate
Annual rainfall712 mm691 mm
Mean max, January24.1°C24.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Oaks edges out on average school ICSEA (965 vs 943). Oaks also has a higher family-household share (113% vs 78%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Oaks vs Bishopsbourne: common questions

Does Oaks or Bishopsbourne have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Oaks scores 965 vs 943 in Bishopsbourne. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.