Oasis Gardens vs Red Hill Rockhampton.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Red Hill Rockhampton edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Red Hill Rockhampton scores higher on walkability (52/100 vs 94/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Red Hill Rockhampton (949) sits above Oasis Gardens (946).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Red Hill Rockhampton edges out on average school ICSEA (949 vs 946).
Common questions
Does Oasis Gardens or Red Hill Rockhampton have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Red Hill Rockhampton scores 949 vs 946 in Oasis Gardens. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Oasis Gardens or Red Hill Rockhampton?
Red Hill Rockhampton scores 94/100 on walkability vs 52/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Oasis Gardens against another suburb