Side by sideSuburb comparison
Oxley vs Mount Foster.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.
The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.
The numbers behind the take
Oxley
Metric
Mount Foster
Price & Market
–
Median house
–
–
Median unit
–
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
–
Days on market
–
Rental
$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
–
Owner occupied
–
–
Renter occupied
–
Lifestyle & Demographics
0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
2,055
Population
18
46
Median age
48
Risk & Hazard
–
Flood class
–
–
Bushfire risk
–
Schools
2
Schools nearby
2
900
Avg ICSEA
900
Climate
–
Annual rainfall
–
–
Mean max (Jan)
–
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Oxley against another suburb