Side by sideSuburb comparison

Paddington vs Centennial Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Centennial Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Centennial Park (1158) sits above Paddington (1140). Paddington skews owner-occupied (53%), Centennial Park runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Centennial Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1158 vs 1140).

Common questionsPaddington vs Centennial Park

Common questions

Does Paddington or Centennial Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Centennial Park scores 1158 vs 1140 in Paddington. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Paddington
Metric
Centennial Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$595/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$595/wk
$650/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
53.0%
Owner occupied
43.0%
45.0%
Renter occupied
55.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
12,701
Population
2,225
38
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1140
Avg ICSEA
1158

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).