Side by sideSuburb comparison

Palen Creek vs Running Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Palen Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Palen Creek (988) sits above Running Creek (982).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Palen Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (988 vs 982).

Common questionsPalen Creek vs Running Creek

Common questions

Does Palen Creek or Running Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Palen Creek scores 988 vs 982 in Running Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Palen Creek
Metric
Running Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$231/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$196/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
22.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
368
Population
938
41
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
20
988
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).