Side by sideSuburb comparison

Palmwoods vs Mullumbimby Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Palmwoods edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Palmwoods (1043) sits above Mullumbimby Creek (1040). Mullumbimby Creek skews owner-occupied (80%), Palmwoods runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Palmwoods edges out on average school ICSEA (1043 vs 1040). Mullumbimby Creek also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 59%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsPalmwoods vs Mullumbimby Creek

Common questions

Does Palmwoods or Mullumbimby Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Palmwoods scores 1043 vs 1040 in Mullumbimby Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Palmwoods
Metric
Mullumbimby Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$460/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$460/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$440/wk
68.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
45.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
78
Population
512
40
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
11
1043
Avg ICSEA
1040

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).